Created by Elyse Fox (Unlicensed), last modified on Jun 16, 2020
Date
Participants
Meeting recording
https://csus.zoom.us/rec/share/3tdlFe3W7nhIXbfitx_iVZIhPqL_T6a80SRN_vEOzUzXDwLFTdKuhNAsh8UWn7UX
Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
| | | [Press record] |
| Call for nominations | Elyse Fox (Unlicensed) | Nominations due by Monday, May 25th Lia will be the new Chair, effective July 1st
|
| Resource type additions | Nicole Shibata (Unlicensed) Elyse Fox (Unlicensed) | Possible to add campus specific resource types? Student works: Journal, Capstone project, Graduate project Faculty publications: Journal, Abstract, Book review Approved - campuses can add as needed
Process for handling campus-specific modifications Formats: Samvera does extract some information; potentially could add a format field, examples? (CSUN: browse by format?) Revisit extent field? Resource type is a multi-valued field, so that could be a way to accommodate the format issues KC: Can retain those labels for migrated data and evaluate if they need to be added to work forms
|
| Metadata recommendations for DAWG
| Elyse Fox (Unlicensed)
| |
| Subject access review | Elyse Fox (Unlicensed) | Responses Discipline specific subject headings vs. fast pros: easy to use, cons: not applicable to disciplines in many cases
ULMS: will be possible to include normalization in the pipe to PRIMO Decision: Let’s ditch fast Action: Revisit the discipline based LR: contribute to CSU statement on Subject access across our catalogs and collections
|
TBD | TRELLO board / future projects | Elyse Fox (Unlicensed) | [To review with Lia 5/28] |
| Degree name vs Degree level | Kevin Cloud (Unlicensed) | |
Action items
- Work with Lia on Chair handoff
- Revisit Discipline based faceting / discipline based subject acces
Decisions
- Remove fast integration from Subject field
- KC will revert degree level back to truncated list